literature review rubric thesis
| Criteria | Levels of Achievement | |||
| Content 70% | Advanced 90-100% | Proficient 70-89% | Developing 1-69% | Not present |
| Content | 32 to 35 points
Literature review is thorough, unbiased, and portrays a holistic, well thought-through perspective on the topic. |
25 to 31 points
Literature review attempts but sometimes fails to maintain an objective, interdisciplinary perspective on the topic. |
1 to 24 points
Literature review lacks interdisciplinary focus; information is poorly presented or not in the form of a literature review. |
0 points
Not present |
| Research | 32 to 35 points
Literature review contains sources from all disciplines involved and leaves no gaps or unanswered questions. |
25 to 31 points
Literature review leaves some questions unanswered, fails to research some disciplines, or contains 1-2 non-scholarly or irrelevant sources. |
1 to 24 points
Literature review is based largely on untrustworthy, irrelevant, or non-scholarly sources, and some disciplines are not represented. |
0 points
Not present |
| Structure 30% | Advanced 90-100% | Proficient 70-89% | Developing 1-69% | Not present |
| Grammar, Punctuation, Spelling, and Formatting | 27 to 30 points
Few mistakes are evident. |
21 to 26 points
Mistakes detract somewhat from the information being delivered. |
1 to 20 points
Mistakes promote confusion or show a lack of professionalism. |
0 points
Not present |