Best writers. Best papers. Let professionals take care of your academic papers

Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon "FIRST15"
ORDER NOW

See the Case Analysis Instructions for further information about completing this assignment.

Foreachfactpattern, specifytheessentiallegalissue(s) involved, describethelegalconceptsfromthetext, decidewhichsideshouldwin, andexplainyourreasoningandhowyouusedthelegalconceptstoarriveatyourdecision. SeetheCaseAnalysisInstructionsforfurtherinformationaboutcompletingthisassignment.Brian Short v. State of FloridaBrianandJenniferwereinlove. Theyhadbeenhighschoolsweethearts, andtheyplannedtogetmarriedwhentheybothgraduatedfromSaintLeoUniversity. However, therewasoneproblem: BrianandJenniferwerebothveryshort. Eachstoodlessthanfivefeettall. ThestateofFloridahadrecentlypassedalawthatprohibitedtwoveryshortpeoplefrommarrying. Indefenseofthelaw, thestateassertedthatinordertomaintaindominancewiththestateuniversityathleticprograms (e.g. Gatorfootballandbasketball, Seminolefootball), thestatehadalegitimateinterestinmakingsurethatthechildrenborninFloridawouldbeastallaspossible. Afterall, footballbringsinsomuchmoneytotheuniversities, whichallowslessfinancialstrainonthestatetosupportthem. Further, biggerchildrenarelesslikelytofallintosmallholes, andseatbeltscanfitthembetter; thus, thislawwouldprotectallthechildrenofthestate. Thislawwastitled “Maintainingthesizeofourchildren” law. BrianandJenniferhavesuedthestate, claimingthatthelawisunconstitutional.Michael v. UniversityMichaelpulledan “all-nighter” studyingforanimportantexam. Hewasexhaustedthenextday, andduringtheexam, performed “head-rotations” toloosenhiscrampedneckmuscles. Dr. Pickett, whowasproctoringtheexam, sawhimstretchingandthoughthewaslookingattheanswersheetofthestudentsettingnexttohim. Shetookhisexamanddismissedhimfromtheclassroom. Shealsotoldhimthatbecauseofhischeating, hewouldautomaticallyfailtheclass. Thenextday, MichaeldiscoveredthathehadbeendismissedfromtheUniversitywithnotuitionrefundsandthathistranscriptshadbeendeleted. MichaelissuingtheUniversityclaimingthattheUniversity’sactionswereunconstitutionalandaskingtobereinstatedandtocontinuehiseducationwithoutpenalty.Taylor Lautner v. Taylor SwiftTaylorSwiftwaslivinginthesamehousewithTaylorLautnerforthreeyears. Duringthattime, theybothpursuedindependentactingandmusiccareers, andeachearnedsubstantialincome. Theywereasmuchinloveascanbeandsharedmanygoodtimes. Theyneverpooledtheirfinancialresourcesintooneaccount, andeachpaidtheirownexpensesexceptfortherent, whichtheysplitdownthemiddle. Bymutualconsent, theyagreedthattheyhadfallenoutofloveandwereeachinterestedinpursuingotherrelationships. Afterashorttime, Mr. Lautner’sactingrolesdriedup. HeisnowsuingMs. Swiftforhalfofeverythingsheearnedwhiletheywerecohabitatingtogether.